Authored by Lance Roberts via RealInvestmentAdvice.com,
All it took was two 10% stock market corrections in a single year and some heavy “browbeating” from President Trump to reverse Jerome Powell’s hawkish stance on hiking interest rates.
On Wednesday, Powell took to the microphone to give the markets what they have been longing for – the “Powell Put.” During his speech, Powell took to a different tone than seen previously and specifically when he stated that current rates are “just below” the range of estimates for a “neutral rate.” This is a sharply different tone than seen previously when he suggested that a “neutral rate” was still a long way off.
Importantly, while the market surged higher after the comments on the suggestion the Fed was close to “being done” hiking rates, it also suggests the outlook for inflation and economic growth has fallen. With the Fed Funds rate running at near 2%, if the Fed now believes such is close to a “neutral rate,” it would suggest that expectations of economic growth will slow in the quarters ahead from nearly 6.0% in Q2 of 2018 to roughly 2.5% in 2019.
Such will also correspond with a drop in inflationary pressures, as we noted previously, which is already occurring with the drop in energy prices.
“More importantly, falling oil prices are going to put the Fed in a very tough position in the next couple of months as the expected surge in inflationary pressures, in order to justify higher rates, once again fails to appear. The chart below shows breakeven 5-year and 10-year inflation rates versus oil prices.”
But here was the key comment that suggests the recent blasting by President Trump hit home:
“Powell says moving too fast would risk shortening U.S. expansion, moving too slow could risk higher inflation and destabilizing financial imbalances.”
President Trump has been adamant that Powell’s aggressiveness was jeopardizing the economic recovery.
More interesting was when Powell reiterated they see “no major asset class, however, where valuations appear far in excess of standard benchmarks”
I am not sure which benchmarks the Fed looks at exactly.
The real risk to the market is not valuations at historically high levels by virtually every measure, but rather the risk of a credit related event due to the impact of higher rates on an abundance of lower-rated corporate debt.
Nonetheless, in the short-term, the “bulls” got their Christmas wish as noted by Bloomberg economists
“Tim Mahedy and Yelena Shulyatyeva:
‘Powell’s comment that rates are just below neutral is a step back from his comments earlier in the fall implying the FOMC still has a ways to go. This could be the first sign that the pace of rate hikes is set to slow next year.’
However, not all economists got the same dovish message as noted by Greg Robb via Marketwatch.
“I really don’t think he was dovish, not really. He didn’t say inflation was weaker or the economy was weaker than we thought. It is a bit of a market overreaction.” -Paul Ashworth, chief U.S. economist at Capital Economics.
“The Fed has said they wanted to go above neutral. If they wanted to be neutral, they could have walked that back. He gave no hint of a pause in December.” – Avery Shenfeld, chief economist at CIBC
All the “bulls” need now is for President Trump to “cave in” on his demands on China, a problem he created in the first place, at this weekends G-20 summit. I would expect a deal that is well short of any original objective as China agrees to issues which are economically unimportant to them. However, such will “look like a win” for the Trump administration and should clear the way for “Santa to visit Broad and Wall.”
After that, it’s anyone’s guess, but the real issues plaguing the economy and the markets have not been resolved.
Just something to think about as you catch up on your weekend reading list.
Economy & Fed
Most Read On RIA
Research / Interesting Reads
“There is nothing like price to change sentiment.“ – Helene Meisler
RSS < click to continue reading